RAM SETHU: PROOF OF GREAT SCIENCE OF ANCIENT PAST
nbsp; Indian Historians: Notorious or Ignorant
More than the hundred years ago, when History of India was total underneath British influence, there was no room for Ramayan as good as Mahabharat as chronological events. They were epics as good as of no significance for students. It is startling that India is the single republic whose story has been total by the enemies as good as the total republic nonetheless follows it. No disbelief the story was the vital conflict upon Indian civilized universe as good as enlightenment that paved approach for horse opera enlightenment in to the nation. With time, law is elaborating back. Science of India that was denied is right divided supposed by horse opera influence. The misconceptions have been unexpected looming to be history. And the single such story is Ram Sethu. Since, it is the story of Hindus, governing body as good as literates have been not ready to accept it as truth.
If they have been so intelligent, let them go by this article. you plea them by couple of questions referred to in confidant in this article.
Let us have the credentials of what politicians as good as historians (British total story literates) contend about Ram Sethu.
Historian B.D. Chattopadhyay of Jawaharlal Nehru University says the archaeological jot down says zero of the sort. There is no justification of the tellurian participation in the subcontinent, he says, prior to rounded off 250,000 to 300,000 years ago. It is in all believed man’s hominid ancestors did not leave their African home until about dual million years ago.
Very critical infer here is that Mr. Chattopadhyay has forgot to note that what is pronounced of hominid ancestors is additionally the thought – the thought generated by Western people as good as followed by Mr. Chattopadhyay – not Truth, not Science. Surely Ramayan, if the thought is the thought of eastern people – Indian People. Mr. Chattopadhyay is perplexing to deliver the thought clash.
Why Mr. Chattopadhyay wants to challenge the loyal example with the fake belief? Does Mr. Chattopadhyay wish to contend that Lord Rama is low in the heart of billions of Indians to this date though any truth? Can fake ideology find so low base in multitude as good as for so prolonged time?
I review the identical criticism from N Ramanujam. Head, Post Graduate Department of Geology as good as Research Centre, V.O. Chidambaram College, Tuticorin.
He pronounced that Adam’s Bridge is usually the sequence of shoals in in in between the Palk Strait as good as the Gulf of Mannar, total by sedimentation overdue to prolonged seaside currents.
Explaining the bridge’s geological history, he pronounced both the Palk Strait as good as the GoM were once partial of the Cauvery basin, that was shaped during the subdivision of India as good as Antarctica about 70 million years ago during the `Gondwana period.’
They were total compartment the shallow was shaped in the segment overdue to thinning of earth’s crust. The expansion of this shallow protracted the coral expansion in the region.
"The coral cover acted as the `sand trapper’ heading to the arrangement of Rameswaram Island," Dr. Ramanujam said.
The prolonged seaside currents upon the southern side of island total the discontinuous shoreline east from Dhanuskodi to Talaimannar, which’s the Adam’s Bridge.
Let us see what Mr. Ramanujam has said:
How most such Chain of Shoals bridging dual nations is good good good well known to Dr. Ramanujam? Is there any alternative Geographical erect anywhere in the universe – deposits of shoals along the seashore doesn’t contend that it bridges dual land pieces?
Again Mr. Ramanujam is receiving await of an additional thought to kick the truth. He is articulate of Gondwana theory, the speculation that has no petrify explanation – an hypothetical subject with the little systematic explanation during the behind of it. Hundreds of such speculation can be generated shaped upon Geographical principles, though that do not challenge the petrify reason of existence.
Why did Gondwana speculation leave the snippet of usually One Bridge upon the Globe?
Very critical – Ramanujam is incompetent to shift the names of dual places as Dhanuskodi as good as Talaimannar that have been not English names as they already exist, as good as as the result successfully accepts the argumentative English name of Adam’s Bridge instead of Ram Setu. Mr. Ramanujam could really simply put his speculation with the name of the Bridge still as Ram Setu. But he ends up in observant that is Adam’s Bridge – WHY?
Why did Mr. Ramanujam accept Adam’s speculation to be correct? Does Mr. Ramanujam wish to await that Adam as good as Eve existed as good as Lord Rama didn’t exist?
If yes, afterwards Adam as good as Eve existed in India alone as the overpass is in India – Again debate – as Manu Shatrupa would be some-more good good good well known names in this segment as good as result to Adam as good as Eve. Moreover, acceptance of Adam’s Bridge is acceptance that it was set up by Adam. Actually, the explanation fits conflicting to them – how can the initial male upon earth set up the overpass of that volume? He would be juvenile during initial place, he is alone during second place as good as given will he ever try to overpass the sea? Though the usually justification is with India, no explanation fits to the name as ‘Adam’s Bridge’. This obviously reflects the Christian genius perplexing to levy as good as kill Hindu greatness. And bad Historians of India, brought up in the preparation complement of English, incompetent to mangle the operation of fake audacity of being tall literary, seems to be helplessly observant that Ram Setu Bandh is not historical. They cannot even reason the sparse prophesy that humans have set up wall of length of Great wall of China that is manifest from even Satellite; what would stop humans to set up Ram Setu Bandh as good as what is startling or hostile to the actuality that it was built as the partial of Ramayan as the history.
Does Mr. Ramanujam wish to contend that if Adam built it, it is history, though if Lord Rama built it it is the Myth as good as the healthy construct?
Professor Dupey says that as per Archeological survey, stays from Ayodhya argumentative site has found church stays whose age do not go over 600 B.C.
Mr. Dubey: Do you wish to contend that if you set up the church today, you will interpretation that Lord Rama existed given currently as good as not before?
Temples have been set up as good as reconstruct as good as their age can usually contend about the age of the church as good as the age of the celebrity whose ceremony is finished in the temple.
We need to assimilate sure points here, complicated Archeology as good as Science is distant opposite than what used to exist in really aged India. For instance, aged temples of India, nonetheless existing, were built upon the opposite record than what you find in complicated polite engineering. This doesn’t meant that really aged archeology was not carrying arithmetic majority – in fact, if you demeanour during Temples of India, Jagannath Puri church for instance, you do not find any iron or pillars used to set up the church – nonetheless it stands from hundreds of years to the tallness of around 200 ft.
Assume that Puri church would have been razed the little 10000 years ago, what record or archeological proofs would be subsequent to interpretation that the church was 200 ft high?
Similarly, the Ram Setu bandh has seen ages, as good as that as good not upon land, though in sea – the violent sea. The vital of the mass is already cleared off – the theme to be pondered is that what stays is usually the snippet of the tangible overpass – not the total overpass as it was.
Ramayan mentions that the overpass was built over the sea water, with await of Sea – this implies that there was no ancillary archeology concerned in constructing the overpass – this is simply upheld by the disaster of Archeology belligerent to snippet such constructs underneath ground. Yet the participation of shoals next the overpass as good as their arrange infer that they cannot be found in sea in the demeanour it exists during Ram Sethu.
Now, Mr. Dubey accepts that the age of Shoals found during Ram Sethu goes around 1 million years. He misguides people, as he is the lettered of History total by British, that Ramayan was initial total around 10000 years ago as good as not 1 million years ago. Mr. Dubey, here is the elementary calculation for you to serve investigate:
The age of the overpass as per systematic dating comes to around 1 million years. As per Hindu scriptures, Ramayan took place in ‘Treta Yug’. Calculating by Hindu scriptures (Treta Yug with the reign of 12,96,000 years, Dwapar Yug with the reign of 8, 64,000 years, Kali Yug has usually seen 5,000 years): We know that Treta Yug was prior to Dwapar Yug. So, the single thing is utterly evident. The Bridge was assembled during slightest 8,64,000 years ago, i.e., 0.86 million years ago, that is flattering tighten to 1 million years. Treta Yuga itself is 1.3 million years of age.
How is that systematic age of the shoals as good as the Hindu monthly calendar age of Lord Rama matches exactly? Will Mr. Dubey as good as alternative historians brave to come out of the fabrication of the rivalry teachings as good as try to try the little arithmetic of Hindus prior to they contend have such foolish some-more aged of systematic ages?
2. Analysis of Valmiki Ramayan over RAM SETHU
Now, let us go in to the Valmiki Ramayan as good as puncture out some-more story out of it. Let us be sure that if you wish to puncture history, you have to reason Valmiki Ramayan alone as good as not any alternative Ramayan, given all alternative Ramayan have been total with role of compelling Ramayan as good as recording the event.
Here have been sure points from Valmiki Ramayan to be considered:
1. There is no alternative book than Ramayan that has put in to scriptures describing such geographical constructs.
2. Ramayan says that it was set up underneath the organisation of an Architect Nala – son of the biggest Architect of all times ‘Vishwakarma’ (Note: ‘Vishwakarma’ is the nomination given to the biggest archeologist as good as builder of the epoch in really aged Hindu society, the identical use as you have in complicated universe of ‘Nobel Prize’). Thus, the book creates sure that such the overpass can be assembled by usually designer of top skill.
Why do the politicians trick the republic by observant that Lord Rama was the Superman who set up the bridge, when Ramayan obviously says that it is not Lord Rama though the Architect Nala as good as Neela who set up the bridge?
3. The overpass was (Ramayan mentions the overpass assembled in 5 days: fourteen + twenty + twenty-one + twenty-two + twenty-three = 100 yojans) 100 Yojans prolonged as good as 10 Yojans wide. Data to be deliberate here:
4. The interpretation starts from fourteen yojans as initial day, that is reduction than alternative day’s data, confirming the explanation that initial day as the commencement had taken time to rigging up all Vanars. Second day it took transformation as good as rest of the days the stretch of the overpass assembled is found to be scarcely same. A judicious end of this arrange is finished usually when the eventuality have occurred in reality.
Why did Valmiki bearing his aptitude to get the overpass finished usually in 5 days? He could have good increasing the series of days to assistance people of currently assimilate it some-more logically. Or he could have even marked down the series of days to prominence the energy of Lord Rama.
5. The interpretation that some-more than the crore (10 million) Vanaras were concerned in office office office office office building it, seems to be judicious to fit to await the volume of the overpass constructed. Now, the equate might not be exact, though certainly Valmiki wants to contend that there was the outrageous charge force operative for the bridge.
Valmiki could have simply shown Lord Rama winning the conflict with couple of hundred Vanars as his soldiers – given 10 million?
6. The breadth vs. length comparative measure additionally looks systematic as good as bargain to assistance lift such the outrageous mass opposite the bridge. The overpass is far-reaching sufficient so as to ward off the weight of crores of Vanaras as good as concede thoroughfare to all of them.
7. The overpass is pronounced to be built in 5 days, giving an thought that overpass had to be built in the really reduced duration of time, unwell that the Opponent King Ravana would have come to know about it as good as would have pounded never permitting the overpass to be constructed. Thus, the duration fits the fight logic.
8. The overpass is pronounced to be assembled by around the crore Vanaras, the equate fits the probability of removing the overpass assembled in such the tiny time – the outrageous charge force you do it. Though, the methodology of office office office office building the total is not elaborated as good as condensed by referring to that assorted ‘Yantras’ or Machinery were used to set up the bridge, though it gives an denote that machine were practical to do the task. It should be the theme to investigate about the past. Valmiki Ramayan: Yuddha Kanda, 22.60:
‘Hastimatran Mahakayah Pashananshch Mahabalah
Parvatanshch Samutpatya Yantraiyah Parivahanti Cha’
What was the need to discuss that sure Machineries were used for constructing the bridge? How did an really aged male suppose of machineries?
9. Very interestingly, Rama is not pronounced to have built the overpass as good as the infer clarifies that office office office office office building it was the ability of an designer – Nala as good as not Rama or Hanuman, the favourite of the book. Had Ramayan been the anticipation of Maharishi Valmiki, he would simply fantasized as good as total something identical to Rama built the overpass of Arrows as Rama was the favourite in fantasy. But it is not so, origination the single cruise that it is not anticipation writing.
Why didn’t he discuss it the universe that it was Lord Rama who builds it as good as give the credit to someone else of this good happening? After all, Lord Rama was the favourite of his imagination.
10. Ramayan additionally depicts the materials used in origination the overpass clarifying that it was the possibility, though not underneath aptitude of tellurian genius underneath record await of today.
11. Seeing the time constraint, it looks judicious to have Vanars who have been sprightly in their transformation pciking up materials as good as wise it in place as directed.
12. The places referred to in Ramayan just matches to the stream place of the bridge, to illustrate confirming that the book is not the story.
13. The length of the overpass matches to what is referred to in Ramayan.
So, seeking during Ramayan alone the single can interpretation that the Bridge is not the healthy construct. Having proven upon the infer of Bridge alone that Ramayan is not the book of myth, though the book of History, it loyal divided brings the law that Maharishi Valmiki was the initial Historian good good good well known to male kind
3. Current Findings upon RAM SETHU as good as their analysis
However, you need to serve investigate stream commentary as well.
The initial thing to cruise is that underneath the stream systematic evaluation, the overpass is valid to have the sequence of shoals is thirty to 35 km prolonged in Palk Street, as good as the singular span confirms that it is male made, as good as is not the Geographical Construct during all.
Archeological commentary have proven that initial signs of tellurian inhabitants in Sri Lanka date during the behind of to obsolete age of about 1,750,000 years of the same epoch as Ramayan (‘Treta Yug’, that lies just midst approach to upon top of number).
Sri Lankan Government has finished Archeological Survey as good as found the little really engaging data:
A towering lonesome utterly with herbal plants of same arrange that is found in Himalayas. There is no alternative towering in total Sri Lanka of that kind. This stands as an justification that the towering was brought by Lord Hanuman to Sri Lanka – How was this finished is theme to study? To my knowledge, Sri Yantra of Hindu parable (or might be identical constructs) is essentially the anti-gravitation speculation that was know to the Rishis in those days as good as these things were probable usually by such means. Someday, scholarship will certainly assimilate this.
Ashok Vatika is traced with finish Greenery as good as whilst soil. With the opening of frequency 10-20 meters, dirt unexpected turns to be black as good as burnt as good as it stretches to miles. This rarely assumed as good as it stands to infer that Lord Hanuman had burnt Lanka.
There have been most alternative proofs that have come up, though you cruise these dual points as clever as the Bridge itself.
Can the Historians deliberate the British again as good as emanate some-more speculation around these evidences, so that they can be enclosed in History books opposite Ramayan?
From Ayodhya to Sri Lanka, most of the places still reason the names as it was around the million years ago. Even the harmful Muslim advance could not discharge the names. Ayodhya, Chitrakut, Panchvati, Rameswaram, Lanka – all the names have been as referred to in the book. Rameswaram is the place where Lord Rama worshipped Lord Shiva as good as determined the statue ‘Shiv Lingam’, exist to date as the place of worship. Ramayan talks about Mahendragiri Mountain as the top infer as good as most appropriate infer to watch opposite the sea. Geographically, it is proven that Mahendragiri is the top towering in that area as good as gives the prominence of around 60 km range.
Why don’t these politicians as good as historians contend how have been these referred to in Ramayan? Did these places pre-existed as good as Valmiki trafficked the lot to emanate this story? Or these places were declared after people review Valmiki Ramayan?
The some-more judicious answer is, these places pre-existed as good as the eventuality took place that Valimiki wrote as elegant history.
Another critical of doubtful authenticity subject of Ramayan is ‘Pushpak Viman’ – the car that could take aerial track to travel. No disbelief the Pusphak Viman no some-more exists, though it cannot be anticipation as you have identical air planes revelation about it. What hurdles the judgment of Viman is the bargain that record has grown in stream epoch as good as people were abandoned of such high-tech products in really aged India. But afterwards Ramayan gives the credentials of Pushpak Viman in conditions of how it was acquired, thereby origination the single cruise that it was not the small fantasy. It should not be approaching from the book Ramayan to report the sum of Pushpak Viman creation. The theme that should be asked is where the tangible systematic interpretation of Hindu researches about office office office office office building the Pushpak Viman got mislaid – as good as loyal story of India as good as universe will evolve.
Do the Historians wish to contend that if Pushpak Viman existed afterwards Valmiki would have referred to how it was built? How most story book of currently contains the systematic methodology of office office office office office building machine – given don’t the historians initial do this?
What seems to be fabulous to the Historians as good as Science is the judgment of Monkey office office office office office building the Bridge. But they dont think about to enhance the prophesy upon this, quite given of their inequitable perspective to defeating Hindu faith. We all know right divided that there have been most class that do not exist right divided as good as the largest good good good well known to tellurian is Dinosaur. Why can’t opposite specie exist around 1 million years ago with the genius of tellurian comprehension as good as gorilla identical to earthy make up – something that was called as Vanars in those days? Science do not dont think about to discuss that male developed out of monkeys – though defeats Hindus to cruise that Vanars were the in in in in between form of the expansion the justification benefaction in those days. But no perspective would cruise this, simply given afterwards the sacrament of assent would win then. Yet, there is no disbelief that expansion speculation is again the argumentative speculation existent as good as taught to people, though any systematic justification around it.
No historian can repudiate the actuality that there is the fluke as good as usually the single fluke in in in between the being as good as the feeling in the book called Ramayan. Instead, of right divided carrying set the citation to find out how such thing took place, these universal supporters have been simply requesting all forces as good as theories to reproduce the fact.
Science is right divided observant that the age of earth is around 4 billion years – can scholarship furnish the story of 4 billion years with petrify proof – no the single asks this theme as good as believes science. No the single knows how most era of amiability developed as good as got broken given the earth was formed. No the single knows when the earth was just formed. Actual fictions as good as stories distortion upon this side as good – though the dear Historians do not have the bravery to agree about it.
I do not understand, if such an extraordinary erect is not inside of the strech of complicated science, given can’t this overpass be put as the single of the Wonders? Why can’t it be listed underneath World Heritages (yet say it as Hindu dedicated place)? Instead, the anti-Hindu moves have been motivating Congress to fall short the bridge.
If the drop of the 500 year aged Babri Masjid is not sufferable as good as it total massacre in the world, given is million year aged constructs not protected? Thousands of Hindu temples have been broken as good as have been being broken to date in Kashmir, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, as good as so most alternative countries. Neither media nor governing body talks about it. Why shouldn’t Hindus mount right divided to strengthen Ram Sethu, that is the approach explanation of One million aged story of India?
Tags: Deep In The Heart, Indian Civilization, Jawaharlal Nehru University More than the hundred years ago, when History of India was total underneath British influence, there was no room for Ramayan as good as Mahabharat as chronological events. They were epics as good as of no significance for students. It is startling that India is the single republic whose story has been total by the enemies as good as the total republic nonetheless follows it. No disbelief the story was the vital conflict upon Indian civilized universe as good as enlightenment that paved approach for horse opera enlightenment in to the nation. With time, law is elaborating back. Science of India that was denied is right divided supposed by horse opera influence. The misconceptions have been unexpected looming to be history. And the single such story is Ram Sethu. Since, it is the story of Hindus, governing body as good as literates have been not ready to accept it as truth.
If they have been so intelligent, let them go by this article. you plea them by couple of questions referred to in confidant in this article.
Let us have the credentials of what politicians as good as historians (British total story literates) contend about Ram Sethu.
Historian B.D. Chattopadhyay of Jawaharlal Nehru University says the archaeological jot down says zero of the sort. There is no justification of the tellurian participation in the subcontinent, he says, prior to rounded off 250,000 to 300,000 years ago. It is in all believed man’s hominid ancestors did not leave their African home until about dual million years ago.
Very critical infer here is that Mr. Chattopadhyay has forgot to note that what is pronounced of hominid ancestors is additionally the thought – the thought generated by Western people as good as followed by Mr. Chattopadhyay – not Truth, not Science. Surely Ramayan, if the thought is the thought of eastern people – Indian People. Mr. Chattopadhyay is perplexing to deliver the thought clash.
Why Mr. Chattopadhyay wants to challenge the loyal example with the fake belief? Does Mr. Chattopadhyay wish to contend that Lord Rama is low in the heart of billions of Indians to this date though any truth? Can fake ideology find so low base in multitude as good as for so prolonged time?
I review the identical criticism from N Ramanujam. Head, Post Graduate Department of Geology as good as Research Centre, V.O. Chidambaram College, Tuticorin.
He pronounced that Adam’s Bridge is usually the sequence of shoals in in in between the Palk Strait as good as the Gulf of Mannar, total by sedimentation overdue to prolonged seaside currents.
Explaining the bridge’s geological history, he pronounced both the Palk Strait as good as the GoM were once partial of the Cauvery basin, that was shaped during the subdivision of India as good as Antarctica about 70 million years ago during the `Gondwana period.’
They were total compartment the shallow was shaped in the segment overdue to thinning of earth’s crust. The expansion of this shallow protracted the coral expansion in the region.
"The coral cover acted as the `sand trapper’ heading to the arrangement of Rameswaram Island," Dr. Ramanujam said.
The prolonged seaside currents upon the southern side of island total the discontinuous shoreline east from Dhanuskodi to Talaimannar, which’s the Adam’s Bridge.
Let us see what Mr. Ramanujam has said:
How most such Chain of Shoals bridging dual nations is good good good well known to Dr. Ramanujam? Is there any alternative Geographical erect anywhere in the universe – deposits of shoals along the seashore doesn’t contend that it bridges dual land pieces?
Again Mr. Ramanujam is receiving await of an additional thought to kick the truth. He is articulate of Gondwana theory, the speculation that has no petrify explanation – an hypothetical subject with the little systematic explanation during the behind of it. Hundreds of such speculation can be generated shaped upon Geographical principles, though that do not challenge the petrify reason of existence.
Why did Gondwana speculation leave the snippet of usually One Bridge upon the Globe?
Very critical – Ramanujam is incompetent to shift the names of dual places as Dhanuskodi as good as Talaimannar that have been not English names as they already exist, as good as as the result successfully accepts the argumentative English name of Adam’s Bridge instead of Ram Setu. Mr. Ramanujam could really simply put his speculation with the name of the Bridge still as Ram Setu. But he ends up in observant that is Adam’s Bridge – WHY?
Why did Mr. Ramanujam accept Adam’s speculation to be correct? Does Mr. Ramanujam wish to await that Adam as good as Eve existed as good as Lord Rama didn’t exist?
If yes, afterwards Adam as good as Eve existed in India alone as the overpass is in India – Again debate – as Manu Shatrupa would be some-more good good good well known names in this segment as good as result to Adam as good as Eve. Moreover, acceptance of Adam’s Bridge is acceptance that it was set up by Adam. Actually, the explanation fits conflicting to them – how can the initial male upon earth set up the overpass of that volume? He would be juvenile during initial place, he is alone during second place as good as given will he ever try to overpass the sea? Though the usually justification is with India, no explanation fits to the name as ‘Adam’s Bridge’. This obviously reflects the Christian genius perplexing to levy as good as kill Hindu greatness. And bad Historians of India, brought up in the preparation complement of English, incompetent to mangle the operation of fake audacity of being tall literary, seems to be helplessly observant that Ram Setu Bandh is not historical. They cannot even reason the sparse prophesy that humans have set up wall of length of Great wall of China that is manifest from even Satellite; what would stop humans to set up Ram Setu Bandh as good as what is startling or hostile to the actuality that it was built as the partial of Ramayan as the history.
Does Mr. Ramanujam wish to contend that if Adam built it, it is history, though if Lord Rama built it it is the Myth as good as the healthy construct?
Professor Dupey says that as per Archeological survey, stays from Ayodhya argumentative site has found church stays whose age do not go over 600 B.C.
Mr. Dubey: Do you wish to contend that if you set up the church today, you will interpretation that Lord Rama existed given currently as good as not before?
Temples have been set up as good as reconstruct as good as their age can usually contend about the age of the church as good as the age of the celebrity whose ceremony is finished in the temple.
We need to assimilate sure points here, complicated Archeology as good as Science is distant opposite than what used to exist in really aged India. For instance, aged temples of India, nonetheless existing, were built upon the opposite record than what you find in complicated polite engineering. This doesn’t meant that really aged archeology was not carrying arithmetic majority – in fact, if you demeanour during Temples of India, Jagannath Puri church for instance, you do not find any iron or pillars used to set up the church – nonetheless it stands from hundreds of years to the tallness of around 200 ft.
Assume that Puri church would have been razed the little 10000 years ago, what record or archeological proofs would be subsequent to interpretation that the church was 200 ft high?
Similarly, the Ram Setu bandh has seen ages, as good as that as good not upon land, though in sea – the violent sea. The vital of the mass is already cleared off – the theme to be pondered is that what stays is usually the snippet of the tangible overpass – not the total overpass as it was.
Ramayan mentions that the overpass was built over the sea water, with await of Sea – this implies that there was no ancillary archeology concerned in constructing the overpass – this is simply upheld by the disaster of Archeology belligerent to snippet such constructs underneath ground. Yet the participation of shoals next the overpass as good as their arrange infer that they cannot be found in sea in the demeanour it exists during Ram Sethu.
Now, Mr. Dubey accepts that the age of Shoals found during Ram Sethu goes around 1 million years. He misguides people, as he is the lettered of History total by British, that Ramayan was initial total around 10000 years ago as good as not 1 million years ago. Mr. Dubey, here is the elementary calculation for you to serve investigate:
The age of the overpass as per systematic dating comes to around 1 million years. As per Hindu scriptures, Ramayan took place in ‘Treta Yug’. Calculating by Hindu scriptures (Treta Yug with the reign of 12,96,000 years, Dwapar Yug with the reign of 8, 64,000 years, Kali Yug has usually seen 5,000 years): We know that Treta Yug was prior to Dwapar Yug. So, the single thing is utterly evident. The Bridge was assembled during slightest 8,64,000 years ago, i.e., 0.86 million years ago, that is flattering tighten to 1 million years. Treta Yuga itself is 1.3 million years of age.
How is that systematic age of the shoals as good as the Hindu monthly calendar age of Lord Rama matches exactly? Will Mr. Dubey as good as alternative historians brave to come out of the fabrication of the rivalry teachings as good as try to try the little arithmetic of Hindus prior to they contend have such foolish some-more aged of systematic ages?
2. Analysis of Valmiki Ramayan over RAM SETHU
Now, let us go in to the Valmiki Ramayan as good as puncture out some-more story out of it. Let us be sure that if you wish to puncture history, you have to reason Valmiki Ramayan alone as good as not any alternative Ramayan, given all alternative Ramayan have been total with role of compelling Ramayan as good as recording the event.
Here have been sure points from Valmiki Ramayan to be considered:
1. There is no alternative book than Ramayan that has put in to scriptures describing such geographical constructs.
2. Ramayan says that it was set up underneath the organisation of an Architect Nala – son of the biggest Architect of all times ‘Vishwakarma’ (Note: ‘Vishwakarma’ is the nomination given to the biggest archeologist as good as builder of the epoch in really aged Hindu society, the identical use as you have in complicated universe of ‘Nobel Prize’). Thus, the book creates sure that such the overpass can be assembled by usually designer of top skill.
Why do the politicians trick the republic by observant that Lord Rama was the Superman who set up the bridge, when Ramayan obviously says that it is not Lord Rama though the Architect Nala as good as Neela who set up the bridge?
3. The overpass was (Ramayan mentions the overpass assembled in 5 days: fourteen + twenty + twenty-one + twenty-two + twenty-three = 100 yojans) 100 Yojans prolonged as good as 10 Yojans wide. Data to be deliberate here:
4. The interpretation starts from fourteen yojans as initial day, that is reduction than alternative day’s data, confirming the explanation that initial day as the commencement had taken time to rigging up all Vanars. Second day it took transformation as good as rest of the days the stretch of the overpass assembled is found to be scarcely same. A judicious end of this arrange is finished usually when the eventuality have occurred in reality.
Why did Valmiki bearing his aptitude to get the overpass finished usually in 5 days? He could have good increasing the series of days to assistance people of currently assimilate it some-more logically. Or he could have even marked down the series of days to prominence the energy of Lord Rama.
5. The interpretation that some-more than the crore (10 million) Vanaras were concerned in office office office office office building it, seems to be judicious to fit to await the volume of the overpass constructed. Now, the equate might not be exact, though certainly Valmiki wants to contend that there was the outrageous charge force operative for the bridge.
Valmiki could have simply shown Lord Rama winning the conflict with couple of hundred Vanars as his soldiers – given 10 million?
6. The breadth vs. length comparative measure additionally looks systematic as good as bargain to assistance lift such the outrageous mass opposite the bridge. The overpass is far-reaching sufficient so as to ward off the weight of crores of Vanaras as good as concede thoroughfare to all of them.
7. The overpass is pronounced to be built in 5 days, giving an thought that overpass had to be built in the really reduced duration of time, unwell that the Opponent King Ravana would have come to know about it as good as would have pounded never permitting the overpass to be constructed. Thus, the duration fits the fight logic.
8. The overpass is pronounced to be assembled by around the crore Vanaras, the equate fits the probability of removing the overpass assembled in such the tiny time – the outrageous charge force you do it. Though, the methodology of office office office office building the total is not elaborated as good as condensed by referring to that assorted ‘Yantras’ or Machinery were used to set up the bridge, though it gives an denote that machine were practical to do the task. It should be the theme to investigate about the past. Valmiki Ramayan: Yuddha Kanda, 22.60:
‘Hastimatran Mahakayah Pashananshch Mahabalah
Parvatanshch Samutpatya Yantraiyah Parivahanti Cha’
What was the need to discuss that sure Machineries were used for constructing the bridge? How did an really aged male suppose of machineries?
9. Very interestingly, Rama is not pronounced to have built the overpass as good as the infer clarifies that office office office office office building it was the ability of an designer – Nala as good as not Rama or Hanuman, the favourite of the book. Had Ramayan been the anticipation of Maharishi Valmiki, he would simply fantasized as good as total something identical to Rama built the overpass of Arrows as Rama was the favourite in fantasy. But it is not so, origination the single cruise that it is not anticipation writing.
Why didn’t he discuss it the universe that it was Lord Rama who builds it as good as give the credit to someone else of this good happening? After all, Lord Rama was the favourite of his imagination.
10. Ramayan additionally depicts the materials used in origination the overpass clarifying that it was the possibility, though not underneath aptitude of tellurian genius underneath record await of today.
11. Seeing the time constraint, it looks judicious to have Vanars who have been sprightly in their transformation pciking up materials as good as wise it in place as directed.
12. The places referred to in Ramayan just matches to the stream place of the bridge, to illustrate confirming that the book is not the story.
13. The length of the overpass matches to what is referred to in Ramayan.
So, seeking during Ramayan alone the single can interpretation that the Bridge is not the healthy construct. Having proven upon the infer of Bridge alone that Ramayan is not the book of myth, though the book of History, it loyal divided brings the law that Maharishi Valmiki was the initial Historian good good good well known to male kind
3. Current Findings upon RAM SETHU as good as their analysis
However, you need to serve investigate stream commentary as well.
The initial thing to cruise is that underneath the stream systematic evaluation, the overpass is valid to have the sequence of shoals is thirty to 35 km prolonged in Palk Street, as good as the singular span confirms that it is male made, as good as is not the Geographical Construct during all.
Archeological commentary have proven that initial signs of tellurian inhabitants in Sri Lanka date during the behind of to obsolete age of about 1,750,000 years of the same epoch as Ramayan (‘Treta Yug’, that lies just midst approach to upon top of number).
Sri Lankan Government has finished Archeological Survey as good as found the little really engaging data:
A towering lonesome utterly with herbal plants of same arrange that is found in Himalayas. There is no alternative towering in total Sri Lanka of that kind. This stands as an justification that the towering was brought by Lord Hanuman to Sri Lanka – How was this finished is theme to study? To my knowledge, Sri Yantra of Hindu parable (or might be identical constructs) is essentially the anti-gravitation speculation that was know to the Rishis in those days as good as these things were probable usually by such means. Someday, scholarship will certainly assimilate this.
Ashok Vatika is traced with finish Greenery as good as whilst soil. With the opening of frequency 10-20 meters, dirt unexpected turns to be black as good as burnt as good as it stretches to miles. This rarely assumed as good as it stands to infer that Lord Hanuman had burnt Lanka.
There have been most alternative proofs that have come up, though you cruise these dual points as clever as the Bridge itself.
Can the Historians deliberate the British again as good as emanate some-more speculation around these evidences, so that they can be enclosed in History books opposite Ramayan?
From Ayodhya to Sri Lanka, most of the places still reason the names as it was around the million years ago. Even the harmful Muslim advance could not discharge the names. Ayodhya, Chitrakut, Panchvati, Rameswaram, Lanka – all the names have been as referred to in the book. Rameswaram is the place where Lord Rama worshipped Lord Shiva as good as determined the statue ‘Shiv Lingam’, exist to date as the place of worship. Ramayan talks about Mahendragiri Mountain as the top infer as good as most appropriate infer to watch opposite the sea. Geographically, it is proven that Mahendragiri is the top towering in that area as good as gives the prominence of around 60 km range.
Why don’t these politicians as good as historians contend how have been these referred to in Ramayan? Did these places pre-existed as good as Valmiki trafficked the lot to emanate this story? Or these places were declared after people review Valmiki Ramayan?
The some-more judicious answer is, these places pre-existed as good as the eventuality took place that Valimiki wrote as elegant history.
Another critical of doubtful authenticity subject of Ramayan is ‘Pushpak Viman’ – the car that could take aerial track to travel. No disbelief the Pusphak Viman no some-more exists, though it cannot be anticipation as you have identical air planes revelation about it. What hurdles the judgment of Viman is the bargain that record has grown in stream epoch as good as people were abandoned of such high-tech products in really aged India. But afterwards Ramayan gives the credentials of Pushpak Viman in conditions of how it was acquired, thereby origination the single cruise that it was not the small fantasy. It should not be approaching from the book Ramayan to report the sum of Pushpak Viman creation. The theme that should be asked is where the tangible systematic interpretation of Hindu researches about office office office office office building the Pushpak Viman got mislaid – as good as loyal story of India as good as universe will evolve.
Do the Historians wish to contend that if Pushpak Viman existed afterwards Valmiki would have referred to how it was built? How most story book of currently contains the systematic methodology of office office office office office building machine – given don’t the historians initial do this?
What seems to be fabulous to the Historians as good as Science is the judgment of Monkey office office office office office building the Bridge. But they dont think about to enhance the prophesy upon this, quite given of their inequitable perspective to defeating Hindu faith. We all know right divided that there have been most class that do not exist right divided as good as the largest good good good well known to tellurian is Dinosaur. Why can’t opposite specie exist around 1 million years ago with the genius of tellurian comprehension as good as gorilla identical to earthy make up – something that was called as Vanars in those days? Science do not dont think about to discuss that male developed out of monkeys – though defeats Hindus to cruise that Vanars were the in in in in between form of the expansion the justification benefaction in those days. But no perspective would cruise this, simply given afterwards the sacrament of assent would win then. Yet, there is no disbelief that expansion speculation is again the argumentative speculation existent as good as taught to people, though any systematic justification around it.
No historian can repudiate the actuality that there is the fluke as good as usually the single fluke in in in between the being as good as the feeling in the book called Ramayan. Instead, of right divided carrying set the citation to find out how such thing took place, these universal supporters have been simply requesting all forces as good as theories to reproduce the fact.
Science is right divided observant that the age of earth is around 4 billion years – can scholarship furnish the story of 4 billion years with petrify proof – no the single asks this theme as good as believes science. No the single knows how most era of amiability developed as good as got broken given the earth was formed. No the single knows when the earth was just formed. Actual fictions as good as stories distortion upon this side as good – though the dear Historians do not have the bravery to agree about it.
I do not understand, if such an extraordinary erect is not inside of the strech of complicated science, given can’t this overpass be put as the single of the Wonders? Why can’t it be listed underneath World Heritages (yet say it as Hindu dedicated place)? Instead, the anti-Hindu moves have been motivating Congress to fall short the bridge.
If the drop of the 500 year aged Babri Masjid is not sufferable as good as it total massacre in the world, given is million year aged constructs not protected? Thousands of Hindu temples have been broken as good as have been being broken to date in Kashmir, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, as good as so most alternative countries. Neither media nor governing body talks about it. Why shouldn’t Hindus mount right divided to strengthen Ram Sethu, that is the approach explanation of One million aged story of India?